Page 54 - pclob usa freedom
P. 54

TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN


                       (TS//SI//NF) A second set of CDR-specific incidents, which involved
               raises equally complex statutory questions.  There,

                                                                                               267   According
               to its subsequent public press release, NSA stated that “[t]hese irregularities . . . resulted in the
               production . . . of some CDRs that NSA was not authorized to receive.” 268   NSA deleted the data
               that it had acquired as a result of these issues, a fact the agency then disclosed publicly. 269

                       (TS//SI//NF) The government subsequently considered whether it could, in fact, lawfully
               request an additional production of CDRs                        It concluded that it could obtain
               CDR records based on            reasoning that                      are . . . valid session
               identifying information because           in contact with             are included
                                                                                                    270   Out
               of an abundance of caution, however, the government also determined that NSA would not
               forward any such information to its corporate repositories. 271

                       (TS//SI//NF) In statutory terms, this incident raises subtle questions about the precise
               terms of the statute.  Could                    be considered                         that
               could then be used to “require the prompt production of a second set of call detail records”? 272
               Could


                                         because of its role in routing the call? 273   The answers to these
               questions are murky, and we are aware of no on-point precedent interpreting the relevant terms.
                                                     , out of an abundance of caution, NSA did not forward



               Applications of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for Orders Requiring the Production of Call Detail Records,
               Various Docket Numbers (Mar. 19, 2018).
               267  (U) Supplemental Notice of Compliance Incident Regarding Multiple Dockets In Re Applications of the Federal
               Bureau of Investigation for Orders Requiring the Production of Call Detail Records (CDRs) Pursuant to Title V of
               FISA, as amended by the USA FREEDOM Act (Mar. 4, 2019).
               268  (U) NSA Press Release, NSA Reports Data Deletion, PA-010-18 (June 28, 2018).
               269  (U) NSA Press Release, NSA Reports Data Deletion, PA-010-18 (June 28, 2018).
               270  (U) Supplemental Notice of Compliance Incident Regarding Multiple Dockets In Re Applications of the Federal
               Bureau of Investigation for Orders Requiring the Production of Call Detail Records (CDRs) Pursuant to Title V of
               FISA, as amended by the USA FREEDOM Act (Mar. 4, 2019).
               271  (U) Supplemental Notice of Compliance Incident Regarding Multiple Dockets In Re Applications of the Federal
               Bureau of Investigation for Orders Requiring the Production of Call Detail Records (CDRs) Pursuant to Title V of
               FISA, as amended by the USA FREEDOM Act (Mar. 4, 2019).
               272  (U) 50 U.S.C. § 1861(k)(3), (c)(2)(F)(iv).

               273  (U) 50 U.S.C. § 1861(k)(3).

                                                             51


                                                TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59